CELPIP Reading Part 4Reading for Viewpoints Practice
Read an opinion article, answer five questions, then complete a reader's comment so it stays true to the argument. Practise with 50 real exam-style sets and review every answer.
100+ Tests
Practice sets
Part 4
Reading section
10 Questions
Per test
~12 min
Real timing
Special Note: This practice interface is very similar to the actual CELPIP exam interface, helping you prepare with a realistic test experience.
Tip: Click the full screen icon in the top bar for a better, distraction free exam experience.
Read the following article from a website.
River Corridor Lighting Plan Seeks a Safer Shade of Dark
The Glenmere conservation office has proposed limits on the brightness, colour, and direction of new lights beside the Lumen River. Existing public paths would also receive shielded fixtures during routine replacement. The river corridor supports migrating birds and bats, but it has become a popular evening route connecting restaurants with apartment districts. The proposal has divided conservationists, path users, businesses, and municipal safety staff.
Wildlife biologist Nadia Mensah supports warm, downward-facing lights because blue-rich glare can disrupt feeding and migration beyond the illuminated property. She says shielding focuses useful light on the ground instead of scattering it across water and trees. Mensah does not seek an unlit path; she favours lower fixtures activated by motion during quiet hours. That design, she argues, can preserve visibility while restoring periods of relative darkness.
Restaurant owner Curtis Bell worries that motion-activated lighting may make the waterfront appear closed or unsafe from a distance. Evening customers often decide whether to walk onward based on a continuous visible route, he says. Bell accepts shields and warmer colour but wants steady light until businesses close. He also asks the city to replace public fixtures before imposing costs on private patios, demonstrating that the standard works in practice.
Accessibility adviser Aiko Sato says brightness alone does not determine whether a path feels safe. Sudden changes, deep shadows, and poorly marked edges can be more difficult for people with low vision than moderate uniform light. Sato recommends testing fixture spacing with users before reducing output. She supports dimming after peak hours only where motion controls increase gradually and never leave curb changes or ramps obscure.
Safety planner Rafael Jiménez proposes a kilometre-long demonstration using steady warm light near businesses and gradual motion controls on quieter stretches. Wildlife activity, user confidence, visibility at path features, energy use, and business foot traffic would be monitored through two seasons. Jiménez says the standard should specify outcomes rather than one fixture for every location. The conservation office supports the test, while Bell wants merchant participation in deciding when peak hours end.
Using the drop-down menu, choose the best option according to the information given in the website.
1. Which policy choice concerning wildlife friendly lighting is examined in this article?
2. Why does Nadia Mensah expect the proposed change to help?
3. What consequence does Curtis Bell warn could follow?
4. Where do Nadia Mensah and Aiko Sato part company?
5. What does the wildlife friendly lighting approach described in Paragraph 5 imply?
The following is a comment by a visitor to the website page. Complete the comment by choosing the best option to fill in each blank.
Regarding wildlife-friendly lighting, . Ecological protection and safe movement do not have to be treated as opposite goals.
Nadia Mensah is persuasive because . Curtis Bell's objection stands against that benefit: . On evening walks, glare across the water bothers me more than a modest pool of well-directed light.
Aiko Sato's qualification suggests that . Following Rafael Jiménez's approach, . The test should publish merchant and accessibility feedback alongside wildlife observations.
Continue Test 42 with
Pro
One plan unlocks all 300 tests on the site.
- 100 full mock testsFor CELPIP General and General LS
- 200 sectional mock testsListening, Reading, Writing and Speaking
- Instant resultsListening and Reading scored the moment you submit
- Detailed feedbackAnswer explanations and AI feedback on Writing and Speaking
Secure and instant access. Cancel anytime.